PUC Watch — Free Practitioner Intelligence
PUC Watch identifies the state commission developments, political shifts, and regulatory patterns that serious government affairs practitioners need to understand — before leadership asks what they mean.
Send Me the Next Briefing →Free. Every other Monday.
No daily inbox noise.
Leave whenever it stops being useful.
The Problem
There has never been more regulatory information available to government affairs professionals.
Filing alerts. Commission websites. Trade press. RSS feeds. Google Alerts set to utility names that surface press releases and blog posts and almost never the docket entry that actually matters.
And yet practitioners still find themselves doing the same work:
Sorting through the volume to find the signal. Determining what is consequential versus what is procedural. Figuring out whether a commissioner appointment in Arizona matters to a team in Pennsylvania. Preparing leadership for a question that nobody saw coming.
Information delivery is not the same as intelligence.
Most regulatory monitoring products give practitioners more documents to read. Then they leave the practitioner to decide what matters, understand the political context, recognize the pattern, and explain the implications.
That is the problem PUC Watch was built to solve.
What Practitioners Experience
—The proceeding that arrived fully formed
By the time it reached your desk, the intervenors had already framed the argument. The commission staff had already filed a recommendation. The strategic window had already closed.
—The commissioner appointment treated as biography
The announcement noted her background. It did not explain what her appointment signals about the commission's posture on the rate case currently before it.
—The leadership question that required a scramble
Someone forwarded a trade press article about a proceeding in a state you technically cover. Leadership wants context by end of day.
—The national pattern that looked like a local story
Pennsylvania's data center cost allocation terms became the template three states copied. The practitioners who saw it as a national pattern had months to prepare. The ones who saw it as a Pennsylvania story reacted to each state separately.
Editorial Doctrine
A serious intelligence briefing needs a doctrine. Here is ours.
—We do not summarize everything.
—We do not rewrite press releases.
—We do not confuse volume with intelligence.
—We do not treat every filing as equally important.
—We do not bury the implication beneath the procedural summary.
—We do not pretend regulatory decisions occur outside politics, personalities, and institutional incentives.
—We do not send daily noise to remain visible.
—We do not mistake awareness for preparedness.
We read the source material. We identify what is consequential. We connect the pattern across states. We explain the institutional and political context. We tell you what deserves attention next.
What PUC Watch Looks Like
This is an excerpt from Issue #5. The formatting is the same. The intelligence is the same. Judge it yourself.
South Carolina · Dominion Energy SC · Docket 2025-325-E
On May 8, Dominion Energy South Carolina filed a settlement that brought the Department of Defense, Google, Walmart, AARP, the Sierra Club, and six other parties to the same side of a rate case. That coalition does not assemble by accident — and the commission order that ratifies it next month will not explain what each party gave up to get there.
If you know anything about how utility proceedings work, you understand how genuinely difficult that sentence is to write.
What Most Summaries Say
Dominion Energy settled its South Carolina rate case for a 7.62% increase, down from the original 12.73% request.
What PUC Watch Says
The intervenor list is the intelligence. The order is the press release.
Every issue is in the archive. Read them before you decide.
Browse the archive →Early Evidence
PUC Watch launched in March 2026. No advertising. No press outreach. No sponsored distribution.
These practitioners found it without being asked:
—A former FERC Commissioner
—An Assistant Attorney General, State of Minnesota
—A Regulatory and Market Policy Strategic Advisor at Dominion Energy
None of them were solicited. The intelligence earned their attention.
78.57%
open rate on Issue #2
Industry average for B2B newsletters: approximately 21%
Why This Exists
I spent years in government and external affairs at Pepco, part of the Exelon system. I know what it means to prepare a leadership briefing under time pressure. I know what it means to walk into a commission hearing and realize the other side has been tracking the docket for six months while your team was monitoring the trade press.
I built RegulatorIndex because the primary source intelligence that government affairs professionals need was scattered, expensive, or buried in products designed for legislative tracking rather than state utility regulation.
I publish PUC Watch because aggregation is not analysis. Filings are not intelligence. And the practitioner who reads the actual docket holds a structural advantage over everyone operating on secondhand information.
This briefing exists to give you that advantage without requiring you to spend Monday morning reading commission dockets.
— Michael-Christopher Warren
Founder, RegulatorIndex.com
Common Questions
I already receive several regulatory publications.
Good. PUC Watch is not trying to replace filings, trade news, or your monitoring provider. It exists to identify the developments and patterns those sources often leave you to interpret yourself.
I only track a few states. Do I need national coverage?
Arguments travel. Rate structures migrate. Political pressure strategies repeat. What Pennsylvania decides about data center cost allocation becomes what Virginia, Maryland, and New Jersey face six months later. The practitioners who see the national pattern prepare for what arrives locally.
Is this just promotional content for RegulatorIndex or StatecraftCRM?
PUC Watch stands on its own editorial value. It is primary-source intelligence about state utility commission proceedings, written for practitioners, not for product awareness. RegulatorIndex and StatecraftCRM may appear where directly relevant — but the briefing cannot become what it criticizes.
I do not need another daily email.
It is deliberately not daily. The entire premise of PUC Watch is selectivity — identifying what deserves attention rather than increasing volume. Every other Monday. Nothing in between.
PUC Watch is the free regulatory intelligence briefing for government affairs, external affairs, and regulatory professionals who need to know which state commission developments deserve attention — and why — before someone asks.
Free. Every other Monday.
No daily alerts.
Confirm by email, then read all five published issues immediately.
Leave whenever it stops being useful.
Want to read before you subscribe? → Browse all five issues