PUC Watch · Issue 4
The $67B Deal Has a Problem in Richmond
The state commission path—and Virginia’s two-judge panel—may determine whether the NextEra and Dominion transaction closes.
By Michael-Christopher Warren · Published
PUC Watch is published by RegulatorIndex.
Everyone spent Monday talking about the $67 billion. This issue covers what actually matters: the state commission path that will determine whether this deal closes — and the two-judge panel standing between NextEra and the most valuable utility franchise in the country.
The Lead
On Monday, NextEra Energy and Dominion Energy announced they are combining in an all-stock transaction that would create the world's largest regulated electric utility — 10 million customers, 110 gigawatts of generation, and the most valuable utility franchise in the country (Northern Virginia's data center corridor, in case you have been living off the grid).
The financial press covered the balance sheet. The energy press covered the AI angle. Everyone covered the same story.
Here is the story nobody is covering.
This deal requires approval from five separate regulatory bodies. FERC. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The Virginia State Corporation Commission. The North Carolina Utilities Commission. The South Carolina Public Service Commission.
FERC will almost certainly approve it. The NRC will almost certainly approve it. North Carolina and South Carolina will extract conditions and then approve it.
Virginia is the one that could actually stop it.
And Virginia has a situation.
The Virginia SCC has three judges elected by the General Assembly. Judge Kelsey Bagot — sworn in April 2024, former Senior Attorney at NextEra Energy, Inc. — committed in writing at her confirmation to recuse herself from any matter involving her former employer. Senator Russet Perry said that recusal commitment was “absolutely necessary” to secure her vote. That commitment covers this merger in neon lights.
Bagot recuses. That leaves Judges Jehmal Hudson and Samuel Towell.
Under Virginia law, two commissioners constitute a quorum. A 1-1 split deadlocks the petition. No statute prescribes a tiebreaker.
You see where this is going.
The Virginia Utility Transfers Act sets the substantive standard: the Commission must be satisfied that “adequate service to the public at just and reasonable rates will not be impaired or jeopardized.” Not a rubber stamp. The SCC has to be satisfied.
Given that Dominion's last rate case produced an authorized ROE of 9.8% — after the Commission cut Dominion's 10.4% request — and Florida Power & Light currently operates at an authorized ROE of 10.95% (the highest in the contiguous United States), the “just and reasonable rates” question writes itself.
NextEra's offer to make it go away: $2.25 billion in bill credits for Dominion customers across Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina, spread over two years after closing. Clean Virginia's math works out to roughly $625 per Virginia customer over two years. One-time. Non-recurring. No rate-case moratorium. No ROE cap.
The last time NextEra offered a one-time bill credit to get a state commission to approve a deal was Hawaii, 2016. The PUC rejected it unanimously, finding the benefits “inadequate and uncertain” and the commitments “too broad and vague.”
The intervenors noticed.
The Number
What to Watch
The Take
The 2016 Hawaii PUC order rejecting the NextEra/Hawaiian Electric deal is a detailed, reasoned opinion that addresses exactly the arguments NextEra is likely to make in Virginia — scale efficiencies, clean energy commitments, customer bill credits, management stability. The PUC rejected each one as either inadequate, uncertain, or insufficiently binding.
If you are on the intervenor side: that order is your brief outline.
If you are on the company side: that order is the checklist of every commitment you need to make more specific, more binding, and more enforceable before the SCC filing lands in July.
The deal that gets announced is not always the deal that gets approved. In Virginia, the distance between those two things is currently unknown — and that is the most important fact in this proceeding.
Reply to this email — I read every response.
Entities in this issue
PUC Watch editorial analysis
Trust and provenance
Editorial analysis by Michael-Christopher Warren, published by RegulatorIndex. It is not an official regulatory source.
- Published
Sources
- Native RegulatorIndex analysisRegulatorIndex editorial analysis · RegulatorIndex
- Original email editionOriginal PUC Watch distribution copy · RegulatorIndex
Corrections are reviewed against authoritative sources before any public record changes.